> >
Case Name | In re Alleged Contempt of Albert H. Corliss | |
---|---|---|
Date | 01/01/2001 | |
Note | Atty. who requests/accepts fee based on contingency arrgt. w/ applicant w/o Bd. approval is subject to contempt. | |
Citation | 56 CCC 132 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 27182001 CA |
In re Alleged Contempt of Albert H. Corliss, Esq. , Respondent W. C. A. B. No. SFO 336999 CCC 132 COUNSEL: For respondent--Albert H. Corliss, Esq. He argued that the contempt citation should be dismissed because the Board did not have jurisdiction over the case when the alleged acts of contempt occurred. (6) State Compensation Insurance Fund issued checks payable to Yvonne Fisher, c/o Albert Corliss, Esq. which were endorsed by Albert Corliss, who also signed the name Yvonne Fisher. Finally, the documentary evidence along with applicant's testimony proves respondent guilty of each and every element of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt as alleged in Counts I and II of the contempt citation.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.