> >
Case Name | Yee-Sanchez vs. Permanente, etc. et at | |
---|---|---|
Date | 04/29/2003 | |
Note | Definition of rights, duties, penalties for pre-application discovery. | |
Citation | 68 Cal.Comp. Cases 637 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 29322003 CA |
Nevertheless, PMG went forward with Dr. Hightower's deposition (although, apparently, it never took the depositions of Yee-Sanchez or Dr. Duong). In response to Yee-Sanchez's letter to him, the PWCJ set a pre-trial conference, even though no application had yet been filed. Prior to the conference, PMG requested that the DEU issue a consultative rating of Dr. Duong's October 19, 2000 report. The DEU's consultative rating opined that the factors of permanent disability in Dr. Duong's October 19, 2000 report rated at 31%. However, the PWCJ took no action at that time, but instead suggested that the parties attempt to reach an informal resolution.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.