Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Elayne Valdez v. Warehouse Demo Services
Date 04/20/2011
Note California workers' compensation judges may not admit as evidence reports from doctors who are not a part of the employer's medical provider network if that MPN was validly established and properly noticed.
Citation ADJ7048296
WCC Citation WCC 37512011 CA
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case No. ADJ7048296 ELAYNE VALDEZ, Applicant, vs. OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION (EN BANC) WAREHOUSE DEMO SERVICES; ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Adjusted by ESIS, Defendant(s). BACKGROUND Applicant Elayne Valdez filed a claim for industrial injury to her back, right hip, neck, right ankle, right foot, right lower extremity, lumbar spine and both knees, while employed as a demonstrator for Warehouse Demo Services on October 7, 2009. While the WCJ deferred the issue of MPN, he nevertheless rejected defendants argument that reports of non-MPN doctors are inadmissible. An MPN is established by an employer or insurer subject to the approval of the administrative director (AD). 8, 9762. 1 through 9762. 3. ) The statutory and regulatory scheme also imposes several other obligations upon both the insurer/employer and the injured worker.

Download full case here.