| A district court may restrain, for cause shown, a violation of Section 451.001.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, section 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
|
Relevant Case Law
Note: No waiver of sovereign immunity for State Agencies under anti-retaliation provision.
Note: Evidence supports finding of retaliatory discharge and damages for future earnings and mental anguish.
Note: Official immunity not affirmative defense to retaliation claim.
Note: Employer's arbitration agreement insufficient to cover retaliation dispute.
Note: In 451, "person" refers only to employers.
Note: State agency immunity has not been unambiguously waived in anti-retaliation actions.
Note: Non-subscribers cannot be sued for acts of discrimination under 451.001.
Note: No waiver of immunity for counties in Anti-Retaliation suits.
Note: Case must be remanded on all damages if damage error is found and damages are not segregated.
Note: SOL for wrongful termination begins when reasonable person would know of termination.
Note: Trial court has no jurisdiction if administrative remedies are not exhausted.
Note: Failure to pass performance tests is a valid, nondiscriminatory reason for termination.
Note: Termination pursuant to reasonable absence control provision does not constitute retaliatory discharge.
Note: No retaliatory discharge where termination is part of company-wide downsizing.
Note: Appellate court has no authority to extend section 451.001 liability to nonsubscribers.
Note: Evidence supports retaliatory discharge verdict.
|