> >
Case Name | Jablonski v. Royal Globe Ins. Co. | |
---|---|---|
Date | 09/02/1988 | |
Note | No immunity for TPA who committed intentional tort in investigating claim. | |
Citation | 204 Cal.App.3d 379, 53 CCC 402 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 24261988 CA |
EMANUEL JABLONSKI et al. , Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. , Defendants and Respondents [Opinion certified for partial publication. ]Plaintiffs Emanuel and Dagmar Jablonski filed suit against defendants Royal Globe Insurance Company, Jones Brand & Hullen Insurance Services, Inc. and Michael Petkus alleging a virtual smorgasbord of causes of action. He further argued that his causes of action against Royal Globe and its agents were not barred under the act because that insurer forfeited its protection when it committed intentional torts against him. Co. (1985) 175 Cal. App. 3d 146, 148 [220 Cal. Rptr. 549]; Soto v. Royal Globe Ins. Plaintiff's complaint alleged that Royal Globe denied coverage under the workers' compensation policy and committed other unfair practices.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.