> >
Case Name | Diamond International Corp. v. WCAB | |
---|---|---|
Date | 07/30/1984 | |
Note | Amendments made to conform pleading to proof allowed at any time if opposing party would not be surprised by evidence. | |
Citation | 49 CCC 592 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 27751984 CA |
Diamond International Corporation, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board of the State of California, Kenton Wills, Respondents. COUNSEL: For respondent employee--Leep, Asbill, & Tescher, by M. K. Tescher, Jr. OPINION BY: Puglia, P. J. OPINION: I Petitioner Diamond International Corporation (Diamond) seeks review of an order of respondent Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denying reconsideration. The conference was called at the request of Wills' attorney after Diamond filed a 'request for closure. 'At the time of the conference, Andreasen told Skamser that he did not have any information about Wills' employment and seniority status with Diamond. Diamond advances two more arguments which require only brief consideration. D Our attention is directed to certain orders entered in Edith Whitley v. Diamond International, WCAB No. 80 FRE 43947.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.