Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Dimmig v. WCAB
Date 03/31/1972
Note Going and coming: commuting to and from work not in scope of employment.
Citation 6 Cal. 3d 860
WCC Citation WCC 28511972 CA
MARTHA R. DIMMIG et al. , Petitioners, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEMNITY EXCHANGE, Respondents In Bank. There is some dispute, however, over petitioners' claim that Dimmig was "required" to obtain his bachelor's degree as a condition of his employment. The executives indicated that Dimmig was hired because of his previous job experience in contract administration and because he was considered promotable. Respondents did not contradict, however, the substantial testimony that Dimmig believed a bachelor's degree was required for his continued employment with Memorex. Keith D. Chapel, a friend of Dimmig's, testified that Dimmig had indicated to him that "he [Dimmig] had been hired on the premise that he would finish his degree, because the job required a degree. "

Download full case here.