> >
Case Name | Kizer v. Tristar Risk Management | |
---|---|---|
Date | 06/26/2017 | |
Note | ||
Citation | G052558 | |
WCC Citation | Super. Ct. No. 30-2014-00707394 |
Filed 6/26/17 Kizer v. Tristar Risk Management CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8. 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8. 1115(a). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8. 1115(a). Â IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â VALERIE KIZER et al. , Plaintiffs and Appellants, . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â v. . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, Defendant and Respondent. . Â Â Â Â Â Â Plaintiffs and appellants Valerie Kizer and Sharal Williams (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed this putative class action against their former employer, defendant and respondent Tristar Risk Management (Tristar), alleging Tristar failed to pay Plaintiffs and its other claims examiners overtime compensation because it misclassified them as exempt from Californiaâs overtime laws. I FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY . Â Â Â Â Â Â Tristar provides third party risk management services, including claims adjusting and administrative services, with specialization in handling workerâs compensation and general liability claims. . Â Â Â Â Â Â Plaintiffs presented evidence showing the standardized job description Tristar applied to claims examiners and the standardized procedures Tristar used to supervise its claims examiners.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.