> >
Case Name | Mendoza v. United Air Lines | |
---|---|---|
Date | 08/05/2009 | |
Note | [Unpublished] Because Mendoza failed to give any notice of intent to contest the tentative ruling, she waived her right to challenge that ruling. | |
Citation | A122632 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 35502009 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR LOUISA MENDOZA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC. , et al. , Defendants and Respondents. Ct. No. CGC-05-439627) Appellant Louisa Mendoza (Mendoza) brought suit against respondents United Air Lines, Inc. (United) and Tish DeVere (DeVere) after her employment was terminated. The trial court granted United and DeVere's motion for judgment pursuant to a settlement by proposed order. She continued to work in her position until January 2003, when United expressed concern that because of her injury, she might be unable to perform her work tasks. The trial court had evidence to support its implied finding that Mendoza knew of the content of the proposed order.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.