> >
| Case Name | Curah v. California State Personnel Board | |
|---|---|---|
| Date | 04/09/2008 | |
| Note | [Unpublished] Plaintiff's employment was not terminated because he complained about racial discrimination or about mistreatment. Rather, plaintiff's employment was terminated because he littered, urinated in public, and intimidated his co-workers. | |
| Citation | B194431 | |
| WCC Citation | WCC 33382008 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO No. B194431 April 9, 2008 CLETUS CURAH, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT; CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST AND RESPONDENT. On August 4, 1997, Curah received a 30-day suspension that the California State Personnel Board (the Board) adopted. That time, Curah was charged with violating Government Code section 19572, subdivisions (d), (e), (m), (o), (p) [misuse of state property], and (t). Bennett then watched Curah enter his state work truck, at which time Bennett wrote down the truck's license plate number. According to Curah, "Megag was going to testify about the personal relationships between and among the accusatory witnesses and [Curah]. "
Download full case here.
Download full case here.
