> >
Case Name | Harris v. Superior Court of LA County | |
---|---|---|
Date | 12/29/2011 | |
Note | The California Supreme Court on Thursday vacated a lower court ruling finding claims adjusters are not exempt from the state's overtime laws, without answering whether the adjuster should be exempt. | |
Citation | S156555 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 38402011 CA |
HARRIS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY FRANCES HARRIS et al. , Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. , Real Parties in Interest. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. , Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; FRANCES HARRIS et al. , Real Parties in Interest. Recognizing that the law was unsettled, the court suggested the parties seek interlocutory review by the Court of Appeal. (f)(1); North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. Superior Court (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 1145, 1160; Hood v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal. App. 4th 319, 322-323. )Defendants contend that if the Court of Appeal erred, this court should decertify the class in its entirety.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.