> >
| Case Name | Losonsky v. Tektronix, Inc. | |
|---|---|---|
| Date | 01/23/2013 | |
| Note | A self-represented worker should not have been denied his day in court based solely on his failure to comply with the filing deadline for his amended complaint for violations of his civil rights and wrongful termination. | |
| Citation | B239696 | |
| WCC Citation | WCC 39732013 CA |
LOSONSKY v. TEKTRONIX, INC. GREGG M. LOSONSKY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TEKTRONIX, INC. , Defendant and Respondent. He did not qualify for leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (29 U. S. C. § 2601 et seq. On April 16, 2009, about two weeks before appellant's leave was to begin, he was involved in an automobile accident. Appellant's doctor certified that he could work with restrictions, and Davis Instruments approved an extension of his leave of absence. Although appellant was scheduled to return to work on July 20, 2009, his doctor had not released him by that date.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.
