> >
Case Name | Flores v. Prime Time Products | |
---|---|---|
Date | 10/20/2008 | |
Note | [Unpublished] Policy #293 was a contract of adhesion and oppressive. | |
Citation | D052205 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 34372008 CA |
Plaintiff Adolfo Flores appeals a judgment confirming an arbitration award in his unlawful discrimination and wrongful termination action against defendants Prime Time Products, Inc. , Mainland Products, Inc. , Dan Hammond, and John Hammond (together Defendants). FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND*fn1 In 1996 Flores became employed by Prime Time Products, Inc. (PT) as its general manager of manufacturing operations. However, after commencement of the litigation, [Flores], under oath, identified the handbooks [e. g. , Manual] as 'implied contracts' between [Flores] and [Defendants]. The arbitrator concluded: "$15,000 is awarded [to Flores] for the retaliation and discrimination claims because damages have been substantially mitigated. "Its case heading correctly identified Flores as the plaintiff and "Prime Time Products, Inc. , et al. " as the defendants.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.