> >
Case Name | Lujan vs. Minagar | |
---|---|---|
Date | 12/09/2004 | |
Note | Retaliatory discharge action lies for who MIGHT report a safety violation. | |
Citation | 124 Cal. App. 4th 1040 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 30682004 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT B170438 December 9, 2004 ARTHUR S. LUJAN ETC. , PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. SHALA MINAGAR ETC. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION State Labor Commissioner Arthur S. Lujan appeals from the judgment dismissing his action against Shala Minagar for retaliatory job termination under the state's Occupational Safety and Health Act. In response, the state Labor Commissioner (the Commissioner) cited Minagar for firing Dianella in retaliation for the Cal-OSHA complaint. Dianella testified that after speaking with Evans, she phoned Minagar, who told Dianella she must have known of the investigation because she was Grana's good friend and should have warned Minagar about it. Evidence came in without objection that Minagar might have fired Dianella either because Minagar mistakenly believed Dianella had made the complaint, or because Dianella was Grana's friend.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.