> >
Case Name | Sandy v. Exxon Mobil Corp. | |
---|---|---|
Date | 03/27/2008 | |
Note | [Unpublished] There is substantial evidence to establish liability against Defendant. | |
Citation | A114238 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 33352008 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RONALD SANDY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. Moreover, Exxon retained a measure of control over Albay's conduct at the refinery, and the way Exxon exercised that control affirmatively contributed to plaintiff's injuries. The instruction would have told the jury: "You may consider customs or practice in the community in deciding whether Exxon Mobil Corporation or Merle Sandy acted reasonably. Customs and practice do not necessarily determine what a reasonable person would have done in Exxon Mobil Corporation's or Merle Sandy's situation. References hereinafter to "plaintiff" or "Sandy" will be understood as designating Merle Sandy.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.