> >
Case Name | Chan v. City & County of San Francisco | |
---|---|---|
Date | 04/19/2011 | |
Note | A former swimming instructor did not show that the City and County of San Francisco's reasons for terminating him were a pretext for sex-based discrimination, an appellate court ruled. | |
Citation | A124330 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 37532011 CA |
CHAN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ALBERT LAP CHAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS LAMBDEN, J. Albert Lap Chan, plaintiff below, appeals from the trial court's grant of the motion for summary judgment brought by respondent, the City and County of San Francisco (City). Chan sued the City for sex discrimination and harassment under FEHA and for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Heller said D. told her on September 18 that Chan was "a pervert," but would not elaborate, and told her on September 30 that Chan had touched her sexually. Also, Dere repeated her accusations about Chan to a San Francisco Police Inspector on September 30.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.