> >
Case Name | Leo's Assoc. Inc. v. DIR | |
---|---|---|
Date | 07/12/2004 | |
Note | Penalties enforced for lack of insurance even though reinstated retroactively. | |
Citation | 120 Cal.App.4th 628 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 29982004 CA |
LEO'S ASSOCIATES, INC. , Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant and Respondent. The policy had lapsed before that date and had not been reinstated at that time. It is appellant's position, in the trial court and in this court, that because of this reinstatement, the penalties should have been set aside. Egan asked to see proof of workers' compensation insurance in force, as required by Labor Code section 3700. The court distinguished Woodline because there was "no question of retroactive or backdated coverage" in the case before it.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.