> >
Case Name | Reichelt v. Slotnick | |
---|---|---|
Date | 07/30/2010 | |
Note | An injured worker's breach of contract suit against his former attorney failed because he did not adequately plead his case. | |
Citation | B215506 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 36522010 CA |
Filed 7/30/10 Reichelt v. Slotnick CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8. 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8. 1115(b). Lawrence Reichelt, in pro. Lawrence Kevin Reichelt appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent George Slotnick following the sustaining of a demurrer to ppellant's third amended complaint. He also argues the trial court erred in sustaining respondents demurrer to causes of action in the second amended complaint. We find that the third amended complaint stated insufficient facts upon which to base a cause of action.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.