> >
Case Name | State of CA Division of Occupational Safety and Health v. Superior Ct. of LA County | |
---|---|---|
Date | 04/23/2012 | |
Note | The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health does not need to produce the 2,200 files requested by a litigant. | |
Citation | B235419 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 38892012 CA |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH et al. , Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; MARGARITA ALVAREZ BAUTISTA et al. , Real Parties in Interest. Cal-OSHA has produced those files, along with all the 2009 files, totaling 1,100 files and 100,000 pages of records. Proc. , § 2016. 010) (the Act) applies to traditional mandamus proceedings brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 (Code Civ. Cal-OSHA moved for clarification of these proceedings in the superior court, but the court declined to rule on the motion. Cal-OSHA contends that had the superior court ruled on the motion (and narrowed the proceedings), it would not have granted Bautista's broad discovery request.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.