> >
Case Name | Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin | |
---|---|---|
Date | 06/09/2005 | |
Note | The commercial traveler rule may not be incorporated into the respondeat superior doctrine. | |
Citation | 130 Cal.App.4th 1 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 31032005 CA |
KRISTI SUNDERLAND et al. , Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS SUPPORT COMPANY et al. , Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiffs later amended their complaint to add Mazloom's employer, Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Company (LMASSC), as a defendant. On the date of the collision, LMASSC, a Lockheed Martin Corporation subsidiary, employed Mazloom as a field service representative. Headquartered in Marietta, Georgia, LMASSC provides after-market technical field support to government and military customers which own and operate aircraft manufactured by Lockheed Martin Corporation. Costs on appeal are awarded to defendant Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Company.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.