> >
Case Name | PDM Steel Service Centers v. Mullen & Filippi | |
---|---|---|
Date | 08/08/2008 | |
Note | [Unpublished] Given all of the facts and the controlling legal authority, any reasonable attorney would agree this appeal is totally and completely without merit. | |
Citation | F054031 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 34102008 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PDM STEEL SERVICE CENTERS, INC. , Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MULLEN & FILIPPI, Defendant and Respondent. INTRODUCTION On July 20, 2006, appellant PDM Steel Service Centers, Inc. , filed a multi-cause complaint in Fresno County Superior Court alleging respondent Mullen & Filippi, LLP, mishandled a worker's compensation matter relating to one of appellant's employees. STATEMENT OF THE CASE*fn2 On April 6, 2007, McLean & McLean LLP, attorneys for appellant PDM Steel Service Centers, Inc. , filed a proof of service in superior court. The proof of service filed with the Court for Mullen & Filippi fails to do so; 'receptionist' appears no where thereon. We impose those sanctions jointly and severally against attorneys Mark A. McLean and Benjamin L. Kennedy, counsel for appellant PDM Steel Service Centers, Inc. B.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.