Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Ballester v. Ecolab
Date 02/23/2011
Note A terminated employee's suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress contained allegations that were insufficient to avoid the bar of exclusive remedy.
Citation A129073
WCC Citation WCC 37162011 CA
ANTHONY BALLESTER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ECOLAB, INC. , Defendant and Respondent. BACKGROUND This lawsuit concerns Anthony Ballester's termination from his employment with Ecolab, Inc. Ballester claims his termination was due to a fraudulent report of his poor performance by his immediate supervisor, which was then ratified by Ecolab managers and corporate officers. He sued Ecolab as a result of his termination, seeking compensatory and punitive damages and reinstatement to his position. In addition, Ecolab argued the second amended complaint failed to state a claim for fraud because it did not and could not allege that Ballester relied on the allegedly fraudulent performance report. Finally, Ecolab argued that, as a matter of law, Ballester could not amend his complaint because workers' compensation provided his exclusive remedy.

Download full case here.