> >
Case Name | Sandhagen vs. Cox & Cox Construction, SCIF | |
---|---|---|
Date | 11/16/2004 | |
Note | UR deadlines are mandatory - failure to meet deadline precludes use of UR procedure for med treatment dispute in question. | |
Citation | 69 CCC 1452; En Banc | |
WCC Citation | WCC 30652004 CA |
See Sandhagen vs. Cox & Cox Construction, SCIF (II) (02/07/2005). The May 14, 2004 report reflects it was served by mail on SCIF at its address of record. SCIF has now exceeded the outside time limit of 14 days set forth in Labor Code Section 4610(g)(1). It stated, in relevant part: "I am performing Utilization Review for [SCIF] . . . [in] the case of your patient: Brice Sandhagen. In addition, SCIF submitted in evidence Chapter 8 of the ACOEM guidelines (pages 165-193), entitled: "Neck and Upper Back Complaints. "
Download full case here.
Download full case here.