Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?

Connections

Groups

Community Requests

The WCC website will be down for scheduled maintenance on Sunday, July 22, from 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM

Case Law Library



 
Case Name: Vacanti, Inc. v. SCIF 01/04/2001
Note: Exclusive Remedy Doctrine extends to claims for acts/motives typified in the compensation bargain (i.e. late payment).
Citation: 24 Cal 4th 800
WCC Citation: WCC 26302001 CA
 
 
Case Name: Vaira v. WCAB (California Travel and Tourism Commission) 12/03/2007
Note: [Unpublished] Any apportionment to age, per se, runs afoul of state antidiscrimination law.
Citation: C054948
WCC Citation: WCC 32852007 CA
 
 
Case Name: Valadez v. WCAB 10/15/2007
Note: [Unpublished] The Legislature expressly established that the 2005 PDRS applies prospectively at the time of the WCAB's determination unless one of three specific exceptions applies.
Citation: F053290, VNO0500624
WCC Citation: WCC 32672007 CA
 
 
Case Name: Valdez v. Clarendon National Insurance Co. 12/31/1969
Note: A California appellate court ruled that an injured worker could not proceed with his civil action against his employer and its insurance carrier for alleged misconduct during the negotiations to settle his comp claim because the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter.
Citation: B278542
WCC Citation: Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC606254
 
 
Case Name: Valdez v. Himmelfarb 11/20/2006
Note: Actions under Labor Code section 3706 are covered by the three-year statute of limitations in the Code of Civil Procedure.
Citation: 144 Cal. App. 4th 1261
WCC Citation: WCC 31912006 CA
 
 
Case Name: Valdez v. WCAB 05/29/2012
Note: California's Labor Code does not prohibit the admission of medical reports from doctors who are not a part of an employer's properly noticed and valid medical provider network.
Citation: B237147
WCC Citation: WCC 39002012 CA
 
 
Case Name: Valdivia v. Del Monte Foods 12/09/2010
Note: A trial judge's warning that he might have to declare a mistrial in a worker's civil suit in order to hear other cases did not constitute a prejudicial error.
Citation: F056866
WCC Citation: WCC 36902010 CA
 
 
Case Name: Valero v. Board of Retirement of Tulare County Employees' Retirement Assoc. 05/01/2012
Note: A county office worker with a disabling psychiatric condition failed to prove his panic disorder was service-connected.
Citation: F062601
WCC Citation: WCC 38912012 CA
 
 
Case Name: Van Voorhis vs. WCAB (Bethlehem Steel Corp.) 02/04/1974
Note: Compensation must be measured by the applicant's earning capacity as it existed at the time he incurred his compensable disability.
Citation: 37 CA3d 81
WCC Citation: WCC 30291974 CA
 
 
Case Name: Vanderheiden v. City of Alameda 06/02/2009
Note: [Unpublished] There are genuine issues of fact regarding plaintiff's psychological health and his ability to perform his job.
Citation: A120169
WCC Citation: WCC 35302009 CA
 
33 Results Page 1 of 4