Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?



Community Requests

Case Law Library

Case Name: An Independent Home Support Service, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego, State Compensation Insurance Fund 12/21/2006
Note: A referral agency that provides domestic workers to individuals and entities is deemed not to be the employers, for the purposes of workers' compensation, of the domestic workers they refer.
Citation: 145 Cal. App. 4th 1418
WCC Citation: WCC 32002006 CA
Case Name: Andersen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 04/19/2007
Note: Employer violated section 132a by requiring claimant to use his earned vacation time rather than sick leave to attend medical appointments to care for his industrial injuries.
Citation: 149 Cal. App. 4th 1369, 72 CCC 389
WCC Citation: WCC 32172007 CA
Case Name: Anderson v. Catholic Healthcare West 04/11/2013
Note: A hospital made reasonable efforts to accommodate a nurse with a severe latex allergy and its decision to fire her when a suitable modified duty position could not be found did not violate the Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Citation: A127934
WCC Citation: WCC 40022013 CA
Case Name: Anderson v. Denham Contracting 03/30/2009
Note: [Unpublished] A subcontractor did not owe a project foreman a duty of care to prevent him from falling through a hole in the roof.
Citation: A119834
WCC Citation: WCC 35092009 CA
Case Name: Anderson v. Union Oil Co. 07/17/1975
Note: Employer can provide in a voluntary benefit plan for credit against work comp. liabilities.
Citation: 49 Cal.App.3d 968, 40 CCC 970
WCC Citation: WCC 24601975 CA
Case Name: Andrade v. City of Milpitas 01/04/2013
Note: A municipal employer who allowed an employee to miss more than one out of every 10 days of work over a two-year period because of her fibromyalgia and made arrangements for her to work from home, made sufficient accommodation for the worker's disabilities.
Citation: H037124
WCC Citation: WCC 39702013 CA
Case Name: Angelotti v. Walt Disney Company et al. 02/24/2011
Note: Exclusive remedy barred a stuntman from suing a film production company because substantial evidence showed that it was his special employer, the 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled.
Citation: B219946
WCC Citation: WCC 37182011 CA
Case Name: Anguiano v. Ormco Corporation 11/04/2011
Note: An employer is not liable for disability discrimination because undisputed evidence showed that it terminated a welder for poor performance.
Citation: B228600
WCC Citation: WCC 38212011 CA
Case Name: Antelope Valley Press v. California Ins. Comissioner 02/26/2008
Note: [Published as of 4/30/08] The carriers are employees for purposes of workers' compensation law, not independent contractors.
Citation: B198139
WCC Citation: WCC 33212008 CA
Case Name: Antonio Giusto v. City of San Mateo Personnel Board 12/16/2008
Note: The City of San Mateo Personnel Board made no error in law when it terminated a police sergeant who filed a workers' compensation claim for job-related stress, but was found by a psychologist to have a personality disorder because of his inability to accept constructive criticism.
Citation: A120144
WCC Citation: WCC 34682008 CA
87 Results Page 6 of 9