Pennsylvania Court Remands Because WCJ Ignored Conflicting Evidence

A Pennsylvania trial court remanded a workers' compensation judge's decision because he ignored conflicting evidence and did not adequately explain his reasons for doing so.In Rosenberg v. WCAB, No. 17 C.D. 2007, 2/5/08, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania remanded a case back to a workers' compensation judge. The judge had previously ruled that the claimant's employer, Pike County, did not need to prove whether or not it had additional light-duty positions available. The state's Workers' Compensation Appeals Board had affirmed the judge's decision, but the commo...