The Oregon Court of Appeals revived a worker's claim for benefits for a back injury, finding the administrative tribunals had erroneously disregarded his statements as to how he had been hurt. Case: Camacho v. SAIF Corp., No. A152079, 06/18/2014, published. Facts: Marcelino Camacho worked for Pronto Staffing Services. In early 2011, he sought treatment at the Woodstock Chiropractic Clinic for his back pain. The doctor's report from this visit indicated that Camacho had said his pain started while he was at work 11 days prior. He said he was unloading 70 to 80-pound palle...
Comments