The Supreme Court of Tennessee’s Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel ruled that an employer’s payment for disputed treatment forfeited its ability to challenge its reasonableness and necessity, but it could not be held liable for an award of fees and costs.
Case: Young v. Sugar Hollow Properties, No. E2017-00981-SC-R3-WC, 05/24/2018, published.
Facts: Carolyn Young worked for Sugar Hollow Properties. She suffered multiple injuries in June 2004 while driving a utility cart when another cart crashed into her.
Young filed a workers’ compensation claim again...
Comments