Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Jablonski v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.
Date 09/02/1988
Note No immunity for TPA who committed intentional tort in investigating claim.
Citation 204 Cal.App.3d 379, 53 CCC 402
WCC Citation WCC 24261988 CA
EMANUEL JABLONSKI et al. , Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. , Defendants and Respondents [Opinion certified for partial publication. ]Plaintiffs Emanuel and Dagmar Jablonski filed suit against defendants Royal Globe Insurance Company, Jones Brand & Hullen Insurance Services, Inc. and Michael Petkus alleging a virtual smorgasbord of causes of action. He further argued that his causes of action against Royal Globe and its agents were not barred under the act because that insurer forfeited its protection when it committed intentional torts against him. Co. (1985) 175 Cal. App. 3d 146, 148 [220 Cal. Rptr. 549]; Soto v. Royal Globe Ins. Plaintiff's complaint alleged that Royal Globe denied coverage under the workers' compensation policy and committed other unfair practices.

Download full case here.