Supreme Court Says Foreseeability Isn't Required for Traveling Employee Rule to Apply

The Nevada Supreme Court clarified that for a worker to be eligible for benefits under the traveling employee rule, there is no foreseeability requirement to his injury. Case: Providence Corp. Development v. Buma, No. 84111, 07/13/2023, published. Facts: Jason Buma worked for Providence Corp. Development. In 2015, he traveled from his home in Nevada to Texas for a work conference. While in Texas, Buma stayed at a ranch owned by his friend and co-worker.  The men had several joint presentations at the conference. One evening after the two men had finished preparing for the fo...