Attorneys, payers and providers are asking the California Division of Workers’ Compensation to remove what they see as ambiguities in proposed rules that outline how to evaluate the best available research to support a treatment request when guidelines are silent or have been rebutted.
System users are generally supportive of the division’s plans to clarify the process through which evidence-based clinical decisions are made for injured workers, but say further revision to rules proposed in May are needed to accomplish the goal of reducing disputes and speeding up the delivery of ...
Comments
This comment is private.
This comment is private.