> >
Case Name | Vradenburgh v. Southern California Edison Co. | |
---|---|---|
Date | 12/06/2010 | |
Note | A special employer's citation of its employment agreements helped it prove that it had the right to control a trucker's work and establish an exclusive remedy defense. | |
Citation | G041931 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 36882010 CA |
HAROLD K. VRADENBURGH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. A truck driver, who had worked at Southern California Edison's San Onofre nuclear power facility for some four years, was injured while unloading Edison materials from an Edison truck. The undisputed evidence, including the truck driver's deposition testimony, established that Edison had direct supervision and control over him. Because Edison did not have an agreement with a local council of building trades unions, Edison could not directly hire union personnel to work at San Onofre. He drove Edison trucks within the facility to load and unload warehouse materials "everything from toilet paper to plywood, pipe, prefabricated pipe.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.