> >
Case Name | Torrance v. Loretto Rest Nursing Home | |
---|---|---|
Date | 04/09/2009 | |
Note | An employer's termination of a claimant for accepting a light-duty job was not discriminatory because of a collective bargaining agreement. | |
Citation | 503056 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 9942009 NY |
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Decided and Entered: April 9, 2009 In the Matter of the Claim of OLIVIA TORRANCE, Appellant, v LORETTO REST NURSING HOME, Respondent. Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse (Patrick V. Melfi of counsel), for Loretto Rest Nursing Home, respondent. Claimant, a food service worker employed at Loretto Rest Nursing Home, was a member of the New York Health and Human Service Union, 1199 SEIU, AFL-CIO and was subject to its collective bargaining agreement with Loretto. In September 2003, she injured her buttocks and lower back when she slipped on a wet floor while carrying trays. After Loretto learned of claimant's light duty position, it terminated her employment in accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.