Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Six Flags Inc. v. WCAB
Date 11/27/2006
Note Section 4702(a)(6)(B) is unconstitutional because the constitutional enabling provision, article XIV, section 4, does not identify estates as a class of beneficiaries entitled to workers' compensation death benefits.
Citation 145 Cal. App. 4th 91
WCC Citation WCC 31952006 CA
[1] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE [2] No. B184245 [4] November 27, 2006 [5] SIX FLAGS, INC. [24] PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND [25] Bantita Rackchamroon, an operator hostess for Six Flags, Inc. , sustained industrial injury and death on April 9, 2004. Pursuant to section 4706. 5, the workers' compensation judge also awarded $125,000 to the Department of Industrial Relations, Death Without Dependents Unit. The workers' compensation judge issued a report recommending that the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) deny the petition for reconsideration. [37] Thus, at present, article XIV, section 4, does not include estates as a class of beneficiaries entitled to workers' compensation death benefits.

Download full case here.