The Starbucks Doctrine: Injury on Coffee Break Deemed Compensible

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 | 0

By Jon Gelman

The New Jersey Appellate Division has expanded the exceptions to the "going and coming rule" by affirming a  trial court decision hold that an injury while on a coffee break is a compensable event. The injured worker was involved in a motor vehicle accident, off the employers' premises.

The employee was a union office who drove a company car from home to work site. His duties required him to travel to a union hall to discuss future work plans with an official. The official was in am eeting and no coffee was available at the union hall, so the employee decided to drive to a coffee vendor when the motor vehicle accident occurred.

The Court's reasoning, of the so called, "Starbucks Doctrine", expanded compensbility to off-premises injuries where the deviation from employment was minor and reasonable. It was equated by the trial court as encompassed in the "the personal comfort" exception.

"Here, the judge of compensation made comprehensive findings based on credibility determinations. He found that petitioner was an 'off-site' employee who, facing an extended wait to consult with an expert concerning a work-related issue, was injured while driving for a cup of coffee. It cannot be expected that he would stand like a statue or remain at the union hall with nothing to do for such a period, particularly when there was no coffee available at the site. We cannot conclude in these circumstances that the injuries were not compensable merely because petitioner chose to take his authorized 'coffee break' other than at the closest location.

"The distance of the coffee shop from respondent's off-site jobsite was reasonable given the rural nature of the community in Winslow Township and the time petitioner had to wait to seek the counsel he sought. The judge found petitioner to be credible, and under Jumpp, accidents occurring during coffee breaks for off-site employees, which are equivalent to those of on-site workers, are minor deviations from employment which permit recovery of workers' compensation benefits."

WorkCompCentral subscribers may download the case by clicking the case title in the sidebar.

Jon Gelman is a claimants' attorney in Wayne N.J. who has authored several texbooks on workers' compensation law. This column was reprinted with his permission from his blog, http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com