Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?

Justices: Worker Should Have Fought Subrogation in Ore.

Friday, September 14, 2007 | 0

A truck driver employed in Oregon but who slipped on diesel fuel in Montana must comply with Oregon's order to subrogate his tort settlement, the Montana justices ruled. In Martin v. SAIF Corp., DA 06-0062, 09/12/2007, the Montana Supreme Court based its decision on the U.S. Constitution's clause requiring that "full faith and credit" be given to the judicial proceedings of other states. "Montana's firm public policy dictates against subrogation claims until after the worker is made whole. No public policy exception exists, however, to the full faith and credit accorded to final judgme...

Purchase this story for only $7.99!


For access to all of our articles, check out our subscription options.

Comments

Related Articles