> >
| Case Name | Tevis v. Spare Time Part 1/2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Date | 10/16/2017 | |
| Note | A California appellate court revived a worker’s disability discrimination claim after she allegedly suffered a psychological injury because of pervasive harassment by her supervisor. | |
| Citation | C074938 | |
| WCC Citation | Super. Ct. No. 34201100116411CUWTGDS |
This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8. 1115(a). Â IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â KELLY TEVIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â v. . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SPARE TIME, INC. , et al. , Defendants and Respondents. . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â C074938 . Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (Super. . Â Â Â Â Â Â Six months after she was hired as an assistant marketing director at Spare Timeâs Lodi facility, Spare Time promoted plaintiff to be a marketing director at the Natomas Racquet Club. . Â Â Â Â Â Â We, therefore, will put a wider lens on the facts Spare Time characterize as undisputed and fatal to her claims. Tevis testified that she did not start to feel better until October or November 2010. â . Â Â Â Â Â Â â153.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.
