> >
Case Name | Respini v. RMG Electric, Inc. | |
---|---|---|
Date | 08/21/2008 | |
Note | [Unpublished] Plaintiff submitted evidence sufficient to support a jury finding that employee's trip was within the scope of his employment. | |
Citation | A119232 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 34132008 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE HELEN RESPINI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RMG ELECTRIC, INC. , Defendant and Respondent. Ct. No. SCV-237730) Plaintiff was severely injured in an automobile accident involving an employee of defendant RMG Electric, Inc. (RMG) and seeks to hold RMG vicariously liable for her injuries. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Helen Respini filed an action against defendant Micah Ashley, alleging injury and economic loss as a result of an automobile accident involving Ashley. As he explained, RMG employs a person referred to as a 'shop boy' to transport materials from the shop to RMG worksites as they are needed on the job. Gugel further confirmed that Ashley was not required by RMG to drive his personal vehicle to the worksite and was not reimbursed by RMG for his travel expenses.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.