Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Tiffany v. Smith
Date 08/31/2012
Note Sufficient evidence supported a jury's determination that an affluent San Diego doctor had discriminated against a physician with a broken arm by terminating him and then claiming this was done for financial purposes.
Citation D058510
WCC Citation WCC 39292012 CA
TIFFANY v. SMITH BARBARA TIFFANY, as Executor, etc. , Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID JAMES SMITH et al. , Defendants and Appellants. Smith called Tiffany the day after Tiffany's surgery and asked whether Tiffany would be able to return to work that week. Thereafter, Smith called Tiffany and inquired as to whether he was available to fill in for a few days while Smith was on vacation. The fact that Tiffany could return to work after his injury (and termination) in 2008 was further supported by evidence that Smith asked Tiffany to fill in while Smith was on vacation and considered offering Tiffany part-time employment. Hamwey felt that Smith was discriminating against Tiffany because of the "circumstances that [Tiffany] had with his health event. "

Download full case here.