> >
| Case Name | Boughner v. Comp USA | |
|---|---|---|
| Date | 06/02/2008 | |
| Note | [En Banc] Applicant failed to carry his burden of demonstrating that the AD's adoption of the 2005 PDRS was arbitrary and capricious, or inconsistent with section 4660(b)(2). | |
| Citation | SFO 0491230 | |
| WCC Citation | WCC 33782008 CA |
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION (EN BANC) SCOTT BOUGHNER, Applicant, vs. COMP USA, INC. ; and ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. The APA specifically provides that "Article 8 (commencing with Section 11350) shall not apply to the Division of Workers' Compensation. "of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal. 4th 999, 1014-1015; Life Care Centers of America v. CalOptima (2005) 133 Cal. App. 4th 1169, 1183. )v. Superior Court (1976) 16 Cal. 3d 392, 411] (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. 8, § 10341; Gee v. Workers' Comp.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.
