Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Hessong v. City and County of San Francisco
Date 08/30/2007
Note [Unpublished] Because a reviewing court is necessarily limited to the claims alleged in the underlying complaint, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgement on the cause of action that was pled in the original complaint.
Citation A113744
WCC Citation WCC 32492007 CA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR TIMOTHY HESSONG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent. Ct. No. 04-430971) In this employment discrimination action, the trial court granted respondent City and County of San Francisco's (city) motion for summary judgment on appellant Timothy Hessong's action for violation of the state Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). He worked for the city's Department of Public Health (department) as a pharmacy technician at San Francisco General Hospital. E. Hessong Files Lawsuit In April 2004, Hessong filed a complaint for damages in the trial court, alleging that the city had violated the FEHA. In opposition to summary judgment, Hessong offered evidence of the work that he could perform if reassigned back to San Francisco General Hospital.

Download full case here.