Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?
Case Name Richard H. Moss v. PG&E Corporation et al
Date 02/01/2011
Note A PG&E attorney's suit against the employer failed because he provided insufficient evidence of a discriminatory reason for his termination.
Citation A126610
WCC Citation WCC 37102011 CA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A126610 February 1, 2011 RICHARD H. MOSS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. PG&E CORPORATION ET AL. , DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS. Moss also alleges that PG&E harassed, discriminated and retaliated against him because he suffered from sleep apnea. The trial court determined that Moss met his initial burden and established a prima facie case of age discrimination. In the end, Moss was fired because fewer and fewer clients were willing to work with him. Moss's contention that "Hartman admitted that Moss falling asleep in meetings played a role in his decision to terminate Moss" distorts the record.

Download full case here.