> >
Case Name | Richard H. Moss v. PG&E Corporation et al | |
---|---|---|
Date | 02/01/2011 | |
Note | A PG&E attorney's suit against the employer failed because he provided insufficient evidence of a discriminatory reason for his termination. | |
Citation | A126610 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 37102011 CA |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A126610 February 1, 2011 RICHARD H. MOSS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. PG&E CORPORATION ET AL. , DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS. Moss also alleges that PG&E harassed, discriminated and retaliated against him because he suffered from sleep apnea. The trial court determined that Moss met his initial burden and established a prima facie case of age discrimination. In the end, Moss was fired because fewer and fewer clients were willing to work with him. Moss's contention that "Hartman admitted that Moss falling asleep in meetings played a role in his decision to terminate Moss" distorts the record.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.