> >
Case Name | Meza v. Aerol | |
---|---|---|
Date | 10/06/2011 | |
Note | The defendant forfeited its challenges to the damages award by failing to object or file a motion for a new trial at the trial court. Regardless, substantial evidence supported the jury's $467,000 award. | |
Citation | B228865 | |
WCC Citation | WCC 38102011 CA |
INTRODUCTION Defendant, Aerol Corporation, Inc. , appeals from a judgment which was entered in accordance with a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Rodolfo Meza, on an age and disability discrimination complaint. Mr. Meza lives with plaintiff. Mr. Meza described plaintiff as sad and withdrawn from activities. According to Mr. Meza, plaintiff became "teary eyed" when discussing losing the opportunity to work. Plaintiff, Rodolfo Meza, is awarded his costs and reasonable attorney fees from defendant, Aerol Corporation, Inc. ARMSTRONG, J. and KRIEGLER, J. , concurs.
Download full case here.
Download full case here.