The Supreme Court of Tennessee, Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel ruled that a trial judge erred in excluding the testimony of an evaluating physician on the ground that he had not personally examined the employee, but said this error was harmless.Case: Johnson v. Zeledyne, No. M2013-00147-WC-R3-WC, 12/11/2013, published.Facts: Michael Johnson went to work for the Visteon Corp. in 2007. Johnson's job consisted of packaging windshields for shipment to dealerships and auto glass sellers. In April 2008, Zeledyne purchased Visteon's glass plant, and Johnson continued his...
Comments