The Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that the Workers' Compensation Board erroneously applied the law of the case doctrine to reject the medical opinions that a carrier had relied on to deny a claim for a new/omitted condition.
Case: In the Matter of Compensation of Maldonado, Nos. 1404365 and A162797, 09/26/2018, published.
Facts: Ramon Maldonado worked for Arrowhead Ornamentals. He injured his back while shaking dirt off a 50-pound tree root ball.
Arrowhead had workers’ compensation insurance coverage with the SAIF Corp.
After Maldonado reported his back injury, SAIF requested tha...
Comments