Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?

Justices Further Define 'Vehicle of Employer'

Friday, June 1, 2007 | 0

A bus that is paid for by another company and is not an employer-mandated form of transportation is not considered a vehicle of a claimant's employer, the Wyoming Supreme Court decided Wednesday. The justices reasoned that an injury suffered on such a bus is not compensable. In Quinn v. Securitas Security Services, 06-194, 05/30/2007, neither party disputed that an injury is not compensable when incurred traveling to and from work, under Wyoming statute section 27-14-102(a)(xi)(D). The claimant Donald Quinn, however, alleged that he was traveling in a vehicle of his employer's, making him ...

Purchase this story for only $7.99!


For access to all of our articles, check out our subscription options.

Comments

Related Articles