Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?



Community Requests

AMA Guides 5th Edition - Impairment Assessment Certification - Register NOW

Case Law Library

Case Name: M.F. v. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management 10/26/2017
Note: A California appellate court ruled that a hotel worker could proceed with a claim against her employer under the Fair Employment and Housing Act for failing to protect her from sexual assault by a trespasser who was known to be on the property and harassing other members of the staff.
Citation: D070150
WCC Citation: Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00039787- CU-PO-CTL
Case Name: M/A Com-Phi v. WCAB 07/29/1998
Note: WCAB had duty to develop record and show surveillance film to defense.
Citation: 65 Cal.App.4th 1020, 63 CCC 821
WCC Citation: WCC 25561998 CA
Case Name: Mackey vs. Dept. of Corrections 01/27/2003
Note: Exclusive remedy of employee not the direct victim of sexual harassment or discrimination is work comp.
Citation: 105 Cal.App.4th 945, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 57
WCC Citation: WCC 29102003 CA
Case Name: Madden v. Summit View, Inc. 08/11/2008
Note: Plaintiff did not know how high he was off the ground when he fell and no one else witnessed the accident. Plaintiff is therefore unable to establish that a safety railing would have been required by section 1621 at the location where he fell. Since he cannot prove a causal relationship between his injuries and Defendant's asserted omission to perform a nondelegable duty, Plaintiff cannot avoid summary judgment.
Citation: A117128
WCC Citation: WCC 34112008 CA
Case Name: Madin v. Industrial Accident Commission 02/03/1956
Note: Prescribed minimum payments do not violate the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution.
Citation: 46 Cal.2d 90
WCC Citation: WCC 33581956 CA
Case Name: Malais v. Los Angeles City Fire Department 03/29/2007
Note: The only reason Malais was dissatisfied with special as opposed to platoon duty was that he preferred the work, schedule, and camaraderie of platoon duty to that of special duty, not that he suffered any adverse employment consequences from being limited to special duty.
Citation: 150 Cal. App. 4th 350
WCC Citation: WCC 32192007 CA
Case Name: Maldonado v. Medivators 06/27/2017
Citation: G052489
WCC Citation: Super. Ct. No. 30-2013-00682880
Case Name: Manriquez v. Adams 04/30/2003
Note: Error to calculate subro attorney fees based on full value of settlement fund.
Citation: 108 Cal.App.4th 340
WCC Citation: WCC 29332003 CA
Case Name: Mantel v. WCAB 03/06/1974
Note: Procedural deficiencies in Order of Recon. do not render it invalid; party benefiting from order may not complain of deficiencies on appeal.
Citation: 37 Cal.App.3d 739, 39 CCC 223
WCC Citation: WCC 26981974 CA
Case Name: Manzano vs. Flavurence Corp., etc., et. al. 07/10/2002
Note: CIGA should not be dismissed until a determination is made on issues which could result in CIGA liability.
Citation: 67 CCC 914 (Panel)
WCC Citation: WCC 28702002 CA
130 Results Page 1 of 13