Case Law Library
| Case Name: | Vierra v. WCAB | 08/31/2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Because the WCAB unquestionably has the ultimate authority over attorney compensation (see Reich, supra, 99 Cal.App.3d at p. 234), the WCJ's order that a fee agreement is not binding is free from error. | ||
| Citation: | 154 Cal. App. 4th 1142; 65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 423 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 32502007 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vilkitis v. WCAB | 06/18/2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | [Unpublished] Current sections 4663 and 4664 require physicians to consider each industrial injury sustained, and apportion the injured worker's disability for cause. | ||
| Citation: | B209235 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 35342009 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Villa v. WCAB | 05/24/1984 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | 45 day time limit for filing petition for writ of review is extended when order served by mail. | ||
| Citation: | 156 Cal.App.3d 1076 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 27791984 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vine vs. Bear Valley Ski Co. | 05/11/2004 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Employee cannot escape assumption of risk doctrine for injury not covered by work comp. | ||
| Citation: | 118 Cal.App.4th 577 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 29852004 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Virginia Surety Co. v. WCAB (Echelard) | 08/22/2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Under the WCAB's reasoning and Dr. Thomas's medical reporting, we agree the record supports an indication of permanent disability permitting the use of the 1997 PDRS. Accordingly, we will not disturb the WCAB's decision. | ||
| Citation: | F055253 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 34142008 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Virginia Surety, Inc. v. WCAB | 01/31/2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | [Unpublished] The 1997 schedule applies in the present case, based on the statutory reading of section 4660, subdivision (d)(2) as established under Genlyte Group, LLC, etc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., B198100, Jan. 3, 2008. | ||
| Citation: | B197490 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 33112008 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Visalia School District v. WCAB (Hernandez) | 12/07/1995 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Written request for rehab. benefits not required; phone call to employer's claims administrator suffices. | ||
| Citation: | 60 CCC 1158 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 28021995 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Von Arx v. Max Equipment Rental | 04/22/2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | [Unpublished] Insufficient evidence to justify the necessary, reasonable or logical inferences of causation from employer's actions or inactions,' so nonsuit ruling was proper. | ||
| Citation: | D048759 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 33472008 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Voortman v. Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Assn. | 04/05/2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | A former police chief was not entitled to have the administrative denial of his disability retirement application set aside based on the two-year delay in its processing because he had elected to take service retirement while his disability retirement application remained pending. | ||
| Citation: | F062610 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 38832012 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vradenburgh v. Southern California Edison Co. | 12/06/2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | A special employer's citation of its employment agreements helped it prove that it had the right to control a trucker's work and establish an exclusive remedy defense. | ||
| Citation: | G041931 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 36882010 CA | ||