Case Law Library
| Case Name: | Vaught v. State | 12/18/2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | The workers' compensation exclusivity rule of Labor Code section 3602 bars the civil action of plaintiff for injuries plaintiff sustained while residing on state premises. | ||
| Citation: | 157 Cal. App. 4th 1538; 69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 605 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 32912007 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vaynberg v. Chevron Products Company | 03/14/2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Chevron Products Co. was not a dual employer of a computer analyst employed by a staffing agency. | ||
| Citation: | A131126 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 39912013 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vega vs. Taco Bell; Cal Indemnity | 06/09/2003 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Board shall set expedited hearing when right to medical control under HCO in issue. | ||
| Citation: | 68 CCC 921 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 29372003 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Veguez v. Long Beach Unified School District | 03/07/2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | 'Per injury or accident' as used in Education Code section 44977 applies to second leave where subsequent injury was known and treateable in original leave. | ||
| Citation: | 127 Cal.App.4th 406 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 30892005 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Ventura v. ABM Industries Inc. | 12/20/2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | An employer must plead and prove that the Workers' Compensation Act applies to a lawsuit that indicates an employment relationship exists in order to invoke exclusive remedy. | ||
| Citation: | B231817 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 39652012 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vera v. WCAB | 08/30/2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | The WCAB properly denied the petition for reconsideration because the schedule for rating permanent disabilities that went into effect on January 1, 2005, applies to the instant case. | ||
| Citation: | 72 CCC 1115 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 32482007 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Verga v. WCAB | 01/23/2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | In light of the legislative intent in enacting section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1), the disdainful reactions of co-workers to the claimant's abusive conduct were neither actual events of employment nor the predominant cause of her psychological injuries within the meaning of the statute. | ||
| Citation: | C055711 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 33042008 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Victor Valley Transit Authority v. WCAB | 09/26/2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | No WCAB jurisdiction over 'contribution' issues in joint venture; not appropriate for arbitration. | ||
| Citation: | 83 Cal.App.4th 1068 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 25402000 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vierra v. WCAB | 08/31/2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | Because the WCAB unquestionably has the ultimate authority over attorney compensation (see Reich, supra, 99 Cal.App.3d at p. 234), the WCJ's order that a fee agreement is not binding is free from error. | ||
| Citation: | 154 Cal. App. 4th 1142; 65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 423 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 32502007 CA | ||
| Case Name: | Vilkitis v. WCAB | 06/18/2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: | [Unpublished] Current sections 4663 and 4664 require physicians to consider each industrial injury sustained, and apportion the injured worker's disability for cause. | ||
| Citation: | B209235 | ||
| WCC Citation: | WCC 35342009 CA | ||
