Login


Notice: Passwords are now case-sensitive

Remember Me
Register a new account
Forgot your password?

Case Law Library



 
Case Name: Yeager Construction v. WCAB and Dennis Gatten 11/28/2006
Note: Labor Code Section 4663 allows for the apportionment of pre-existing degenerative conditions.
Citation: 145 Cal. App. 4th 922
WCC Citation: WCC 31992006 CA
 
 
Case Name: Yee-Sanchez vs. Permanente, etc. et at 04/29/2003
Note: Definition of rights, duties, penalties for pre-application discovery.
Citation: 68 Cal.Comp. Cases 637
WCC Citation: WCC 29322003 CA
 
 
Case Name: Yellow Cab Coop., Inc. v. WCAB 01/16/1991
Note: Corporation was employer of cabdriver with full control over his work.
Citation: 226 Cal.App.3d 1288
WCC Citation: WCC 25901991 CA
 
 
Case Name: Yong S. Kim v. WCAB 08/04/1999
Note: Cap applies to all persons and services, including interpreters; Does not violate Equal Protection.
Citation: 73 Cal.App.4th 1357
WCC Citation: WCC 3821999 CA
 
 
Case Name: Young v. Gannon, DIR 03/28/2002
Note: Regulations adopted governing WCJ conduct upheld; 'filed' decisions means typed and signed.
Citation: 97 Cal.App.4th 209, 118 Cal.Rptr.2d 187
WCC Citation: WCC 28432002 CA
 
 
Case Name: Youngblood v. WCAB 12/15/1989
Note: Board lacked jurisdiction to award benefits 5+ years post-injury.
Citation: 216 Cal.App.3d 764
WCC Citation: WCC 26411989 CA
 
 
Case Name: Zaragoza v. Ibarra 06/08/2009
Note: A homeowner who hired an unlicensed contractor to convert her garage into a living space was not an employer for purposes of workers' compensation because the contractor had not worked the minimum of 52 hours.
Citation: No. G040242
WCC Citation: WCC 35322009 CA
 
 
Case Name: Zarate v. WCAB 12/11/1979
Note: Since not an employee, no reimbursement of deposition fees.
Citation: 99 Cal.App.3d 598
WCC Citation: WCC 26131979 CA
 
 
Case Name: Zeeb vs. WCAB 10/17/1967
Note: Employer loses medical control once it is denied.
Citation: 67 Cal.2d 496, 32 CCC 441
WCC Citation: WCC 30131967 CA
 
 
Case Name: Zeinali v. Raytheon Company; Does 1 through 25 04/04/2011
Note: A federal district court had jurisdiction to hear an Iranian engineer's employment discrimination suit against Raytheon because his suit did not hinge on whether or not he should have received a security clearance, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled.
Citation: 09-56283
WCC Citation: WCC 37412011 CA
 
1683 Results Page 167 of 169